I don't think anyone is mad. I assure you that my reading
comprehension is more than adequate. If you'd like people to think that you're smart, maybe a Mensa
board is more your speed. This is a car forum, and you're
dealing with people who wrench on cars daily. In my
experience, those people do not like it when they feel that
someone is talking down to them. Your responses weren't even directed at me, and I got the
feeling that you were sort of a pompous asshole. This may not
be the case, and I'm not saying that you are. What I'm saying
is that the way you talk (type) to people is likely to make
them react the way they have. Surely you're a nice guy, and a smart guy. Maybe take the Dr.
title out of your name and leave out the "if that doesn't make
sense to you..." bullshit, and people will actually consider what
you're saying instead of focusing on your tone. By the way, your argument about finding a "bad" belt
offsetting the benefits of changing a belt before 60k... really?
You were the one talking about four sigma and facts... why
don't you go dig up data on the manufacturing process and
quality controls for these belts and offer some of your own
proof if you're going to make statements like that? How is
what you're saying there any different than the argument that
perhaps changing your belt before the suggested mileage
interval is not a bad idea?
__________________ how about you man up and kill the thing? Then cut it into little
pieces and scatter them on the porch as a warning to the
other gummy worms not to mess with you. - Spee 00:01:50
06/03/05 Way to try and save face. Better luck next time. (n/m) -
ENVYMYZ 15:24:58 12/09/05
no one likes you, fyi. (n/m) - bjamin 15:28:08 12/09/05
This is something we can all agree on. (n/m) - Kenny
15:51:59 12/09/05 the only FUCA I see here is you (n/m) - ZEngineer 14:17:15 11/30/09
|
20:48:40 12/11/09
